Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Edward J. Mayle to Denver Office
DENVER, CO (October 18, 2016) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Edward J. “Ted” Mayle to the firm’s Denver office. He joins as an associate on the Patent Litigation team in the internationally recognized Intellectual Property Department.
Mr. Mayle spent the past six years as an associate with a Washington, DC law firm, where his practice focused on intellectual property litigation and patent prosecution in the chemical, agrochemical, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical industries. Prior to that, he served as a patent examiner with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the aeronautics arts.
A graduate of the United States Naval Academy, Mr. Mayle served as a commissioned officer in a U.S. Navy fighter squadron, where he was hand picked to be on the first strike mission into Afghanistan after 9-11, and was awarded numerous medals for leadership and valor.
After his active duty service, Mr. Mayle earned a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and earned his law degree cum laude at Georgetown University Law Center.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
###
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
