Parker Lewton is a litigator and pragmatist who focuses his practice on construction and infrastructure projects and government contracting. He represents a wide variety of clients in the construction industry. Parker has experience litigating public and private cases across the United States including matters before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, federal district courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, state courts, Boards of Contract Appeals, and private tribunals. Clients appreciate his organization, ability to simplify the complex, and skill for developing trial records.
Prior to joining the firm, Parker was an associate in the Atlanta, Georgia office of a national construction and government contract law firm where he concentrated his practice on construction litigation and government contracting. Parker also worked previously for a major New York law firm, as well as a global partnership based in Washington, D.C. While attending law school, Parker studied government contracts and served as Senior Articles Editor of the Public Contract Law Journal. He also served as a law clerk for Chief Judge Somers, former Chair of the U.S. Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, where he drafted judicial decisions on various issues related to federal contracting.
Clients benefit from Parker’s highly-developed, clear, and concise writing skills. In 2016, his publication on federal procurement won first place in a national writing competition hosted by the American Bar Association Section of Public Contract Law.
Parker has basic knowledge of Spanish.
*Successfully briefed and presented oral argument for Defendant-Appellee as lead appellate counsel before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, securing unanimous affirmance.
*Secured summary judgment for global disaster recovery contractor, on all contract and Fair Labor Standards Act claims, as lead counsel before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
*Represented design-build contractor before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), seeking costs incurred during the prosecution of contingency contract in dangerous province of Afghanistan.
*Successfully represented joint venture in multimillion-dollar dispute before the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) in connection with construction of U.S. embassy in volatile location.
*Represented concrete contractor in multimillion-dollar dispute before the ASBCA, recovering damages for cost and time impacts and securing an adjusted CPARS evaluation.
*Represented contractor in series of appeals before the ASBCA for work done at various CONUS and OCONUS military installations.
*Represented contractor in ASBCA appeal for costs incurred as a result of differing site conditions.
*Represented electrical subcontractor as claimant in AAA arbitration against general contractor and surety, recovering damages under breach of contract and the Miller Act and defending against various claims and counterclaims.
*Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick
Insights View All
George Washington University Law School J.D. (2017)
University of Florida B.A. (2011) cum laude
District of Columbia (2019)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
American Bar Association (ABA), Section of Public Contract Law
Executive Committee, Member
Publications Board, Secretary
Young Lawyers Committee, Vice Chair
South Atlantic Chapter of the Construction Management Association of America, Member
Construction Law Committee, Member
Insurance and Surety Committee, Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.