MHPAEA 2024 Final Rule Requires Action by Plan Sponsors
On September 9, 2024, the Departments of Treasury, Labor and Health and Human Services published the much-anticipated final rule implementing parts of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). The primary force of the final rule is to implement new requirements adopted by Congress in amendments to the MHPAEA under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, which required health plans to conduct meaningful comparative analyses to ensure parity in access to mental health and substance use services as compared to medical and surgical services.
For background, the MHPAEA (in tandem with the Affordable Care Act) requires small group and individual plans to provide meaningful benefits for covered mental health conditions and substance use disorders in each classification where they provide medical/surgical benefits. While not required to provide behavioral health coverage, large-group plans and self-insured employer health plans that choose to cover behavioral health care are required to ensure parity between behavioral health benefits and other health benefits.
Please see our recent Legal Alert for key provisions included in the final rule.
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.