Insights: Publications 5 Key Takeaways | Recent Developments in U.S. Trademark & Unfair Competition Law
Kilpatrick partner Ted Davis spoke recently on recent developments in U.S. trademark and unfair competition law during a webinar of the Cincinnati Intellectual Property Law Association.
The following were among the key takeaways from that presentation:
1. The Supreme Court’s confirmation in Dewberry Engineers Inc. v. Dewberry Group, 604 U.S. 321 (2025), that the inherently flexible nature of the equitable remedy of an accounting of profits nevertheless is subject to guardrails;
2. revised findings of fact and conclusions of law on remand in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. 140 (2023);
3. the continued post-Jack Daniel’s viability of the restrictive test for infringement first articulated in Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989), in cases not presenting trademark uses by defendants;
4. the Federal Circuit’s war on claimed color marks in CeramTec GmbH v. Coorstek Bioceramics LLC, 124 F.4th 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2025), and In re PT Medisafe Techs., 134 F.4th 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2025); and
5. the possible beginning of the end for the Dawn Donut Doctrine in Westmont Living, Inc. v. Retirement Unlimited, Inc., 132 F.4th 288 (4th Cir. 2025).
For more information, please contact:
Ted Davis, tdavis@ktslaw.com.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.

