On April 25, 2024, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) published in the Federal Register its final regulation on its “fiduciary rule” (the “Final Regulation”) clarifying when fiduciary status under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) attaches to the provision of investment advice to certain “retirement investors." At the same time, the DOL released amendments to a few existing prohibited transaction class exemptions (“PTEs”) (most notably PTE 2020-02) that provide the terms and conditions under which an investment advice fiduciary can receive direct or indirect compensation without violating ERISA.
The proposal of the fiduciary rule (the “Proposed Regulation”) was published in the Federal Register on November 3, 2023 (see our prior Alert for a description of the key provisions of the Proposed Regulation). The Final Regulation revises some provisions of the Proposed Regulation in response to comments the DOL received. The Final Regulation and amendments to the PTEs will be effective on September 23, 2024.
Please see our recent Legal Alert for a description of the key changes to in the Final Regulation and PTE 2020-02.
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.