Represented AT&T in an NAD action in which Charter Communications argues that AT&T falsely claims to have a “faster internet experience” than cable with respect to having the bandwidth to handle large file uploads. Charter also argued that AT&T’s ads also claim that the telecommunications company delivers “consistent speed, even at peak times. However, NAD found AT&T’s claims were supported. (NAD Finds Certain AT&T “Faster Internet Experience” Claims Supported (bbbprograms.org))

Represented AT&T in an NAD action in which AT&T challenged advertising by Charter Communications that (i) falsely implied that AT&T imposes a hard data limit on its internet subscribers, (ii) falsely claimed that Spectrum Internet service offered “better performance” that its competitors with respect to gaming, (iii) falsely claimed that Spectrum Internet was more reliable, (iv) falsely claimed that AT&T charges customers for equipment that Spectrum Internet provides for free, (v) falsely claimed that Spectrum Internet provides the “fastest internet starting speeds for the price,” and (vi) Spectrum Internet has “over 99.9% network reliability”. The NAD recommended Charter Communications discontinue claims (i)-(iii) and modify claims (iv)-(vi) to disclose additional qualifying information. (NAD Finds Spectrum’s Claim Supported (bbbprograms.org))

Represented the plaintiff in a trademark dispute concerning counterfeit consumer products.

Represented the defendant in a trademark dispute concerning the business name for a national chain of flooring stores.

Represented the plaintiff in a trademark and false advertising dispute concerning competing health and wellness programs.

Represented the plaintiff in a trademark and false advertising dispute concerning consumer electronics insurance.

Represented the plaintiff in a false advertising dispute concerning consumer battery products.

*Represented the challenger in an NAD self-regulatory action concerning advertising claims regarding a competitor’s contact lens solution product.

*Represented the challenger in an NAD self-regulatory action concerning advertising claims regarding a competitor’s athlete’s foot product.

*Represented the challenger in an NAD self-regulatory action concerning advertising claims regarding a competitor’s lice treatment product.

*Represented the challenger in an NAD self-regulatory action concerning advertising claims regarding a competitor’s dog flea treatment product.

*Represented a Silicon Valley tech startup in federal court litigation involving misappropriation of trade secrets and other information.

*Represented former corporate officers and directors in federal court litigation involving misappropriation of confidential information.

*Represented foreign corporation in federal court litigation involving trade dress protection for carnival rides.

*Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick