Calla Yee focuses her practice on global portfolio management, including domestic and foreign trademark clearance, global trademark prosecution, international and domestic trademark protection strategies, global portfolio audits, and comprehensive re-branding initiatives. In addition to her prosecution and global portfolio management practice, Ms. Yee handles global registry disputes and enforcement efforts. Ms. Yee works with clients of all sizes and in a broad range of businesses, including the apparel and fashion industries, luxury beauty products, pharmaceutical, health, and medical device fields, consumer food and alcohol beverage space, entertainment and content production, and software and technology, among others.
While attending law school, Ms. Yee was a research assistant for Professor J. Thomas McCarthy. While working with Professor McCarthy, Ms. Yee was tasked with performing research on relevant case law and legal literature for the purpose of updating and maintaining Professor McCarthy’s treatises, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition and The Rights of Publicity and Privacy. While at law school, Ms. Yee was also a staff member of the University of San Francisco Law Review, the literary editor of the Maritime Law Journal, a Board member of the University of San Francisco Moot Court Program, a survey author for the University of San Francisco Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, and a two-time participant in the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition. In 2015, she was a member of the 2015 Saul Lefkowitz Western Regional first place team. Ms. Yee graduated from the University of San Francisco School of Law with honors, having earned an Intellectual Property & Technology Law Certificate, with honors.
Ms. Yee is an active member of the International Trademark Association, and sits on the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Project Team. Ms. Yee has been the chair of the San Francisco Region of the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition since 2016.
Ms. Yee was recognized as a Northern California “Rising Star” in 2023 and the four years immediately preceding for Intellectual Property by Super Lawyers magazine. In 2023, she was named one of the Bay Area’s “40 Under 40” Leaders by San Francisco Business Times. Ms. Yee was recommended by Legal 500 US in 2023 for Non-Contentious Trademark Law. She was recognized as a “Lawyer on the Fast Track” at The Recorder's 2023 annual California Legal Awards program.
Insights View All
University of San Francisco School of Law J.D. (2015) with honors, CALI Excellence for the Future Awards – Maritime Law
University of San Francisco School of Law Intellectual Property and Technology Certificate (2015) with honors
Colgate University B.A. (2009) Political Science, Minor in Economics
University of San Francisco Law Review, Former Member
University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal, Former Literary Editor
University of San Francisco School of Law Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, Former Survey Author
University of San Francisco School of Law Moot Court Board, Former Member
Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition, 2015 Western Regional 1st Place Team
International Trademark Association, Member
Asian American Bar Association, Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.