Two Embarcadero Center Suite 1900, San Francisco, CA USA 94111
Matthew Zigmant focuses his practice on patent prosecution and counseling, primarily in electronics. His previous experience in circuit design allows him to prosecute patents in the areas of technology, including 802.11 a/b, Bluetooth, CDMA, EDGE, GSM, LTE, 5G, and other wireless communications. He has also extensive experience in patent prosecution in computer architecture, graphics processor architecture, memory systems, analog circuitry, networking, interconnect structures, and lidar systems.
Prior to joining the firm, he was a Senior Staff Design Engineer at Micro Linear Corporation in San Jose, California, where he designed many challenging integrated circuits in the areas of wireless communications, fiber optic data transmission, media conversion, networking, and mass storage.
Mr. Zigmant was recognized in 2025 as one of the "Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch" for Intellectual Property Law and Patent Law by The Best Lawyers in America®. He was recommended by Legal 500 US in 2023 and 2024 for Patent Prosecution.
Santa Clara University School of Law J.D. (1996) magna cum laude
San Jose State University B.S. Electrical Engineering
California (1996)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1998)
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.