Insights: Alerts China’s Revised Patent Guidelines & Drafting Strategy
The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has announced significant revisions to the Patent Examination Guidelines, effective January 1, 2026.
This alert summarizes the critical regulatory changes—including AI inventorship bans and stricter dual filing rules—and outlines strategic drafting methodologies to navigate this evolving landscape.
1. AI Inventors Explicitly Prohibited
The revised Guidelines (Rule 14) mandate that an inventor must be an individual. Entries such as “AI” or “Project Group” are strictly forbidden. Patent agencies are now required to verify the authenticity of applicant identity in-formation.
2. Mandatory Claiming of Inventive Features
New updates to Part II, Chapter 4 strictly require that features contributing to inventive step (e.g., unexpected technical effects) must be explicitly recited in the claims. Examiners will no longer consider features solely disclosed in the specification when evaluating inventiveness.
3. Clarified Eligibility: AI & Data Compliance
Patentable: AI solving technical problems is eligible (e.g., neural networks for grading scrap steel).
Unpatentable: Inventions violating social ethics or the Personal Information Protection Law are rejected. Examples include algorithms for covert data collection or unethical autonomous decision-making.
4. Strategic Pivot: “Response Ability” in Drafting
To counter stricter examination, drafting must shift from “passive recording” to “active construction.” This involves forward-looking layouts that predict examination disputes (novelty/inventiveness) and embed “response anchors”—specific fallback positions in dependent claims.
5. New “Either-Or” Rule for Dual Filings
A major shift for “double insurance” strategies: if a declared invention application overlaps with a granted utility model, the applicant must abandon the utility model to secure the invention patent. The previous option to simply amend the invention claims to coexist has been removed.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
