Weather Update
Due to the forecasted snow and expected hazardous road conditions on Wednesday, February 19, we have decided to change this CLE event from an in-person meeting to a webinar. Registrants should receive a Zoom webinar link. For any questions, or for registrations after February 17, please contact Vanessa Hardee and Ainsley Fischman.
Kilpatrick Partners Steve Gardner and Allison Dobson will discuss important patent cases from 2024 and what the opinions in those cases mean to in-house counsel and intellectual property managers.
Event Details
Wednesday, February 19, 2025
Zoom
CLE Credit
To meet MCLE regulators’ attendance verification requirements for sponsors you must answer the poll questions during the program.
MCLE credit approval is pending. Credit generally is submitted, or certificates issued, within 60 days of post-program approval. CLE approval can take up to 90 days.
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP will apply for CLE credit when eligible in California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Virginia, and Washington. For states not listed, a Certificate of Attendance that lawyers may use to claim credit based on reciprocity or self-apply for credit will be provided.
Contact
Vanessa Hardee
Marketing Manager
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
