Wednesday, September 10, 2025
3 Times Square, 28th Floor, New York, NY 10036
In celebration of New York Fashion Week 2025, we invite you to join Kilpatrick’s exclusive three-part Fashion Law series, presented by our renowned Fashion & Luxury Goods team. This essential programming offers timely insights and practical guidance on the legal challenges shaping today’s global fashion industry, including an in-person program and reception at our new Times Square offices on September 10, 2025, featuring an in-depth discussion of the new New York State Fashion Workers Act. Additional webinar sessions will cover international sustainability standards, cross-border advertising, and strategies for IP protection in a rapidly evolving, AI-driven landscape. Designed for business leaders, designers, supply chain partners, and legal professionals, this series delivers actionable knowledge to help you navigate the opportunities and complexities of the modern fashion world.
New compliance requirements are now in effect for fashion brands, agencies, and intermediaries. The New York Fashion Workers Act, effective June 19, 2025, introduces significant legal obligations for brands that hire models and creatives — whether directly or through third parties. This session will break down the Act's core requirements, including agency registration, mandatory contract terms, anti-harassment policies, and AI-related protections. Join our experts to explore what the Act means for brands and gain practical guidance to prepare your legal team for compliance.
4:00-4:30 p.m. ET - Registration & Welcome
4:30-5:30 p.m. ET - Presentation
5:30-6:30 p.m. ET - Industry Mixer & Conversations
Key Highlights:
- Is Your Brand Covered? Understand how the Act applies to your business and which entities fall under its scope.
- Legal Risk Awareness: Identify potential liabilities tied to model and creative talent hiring practices.
- Clear Compliance Steps: Learn what your brand must do now to meet the Act’s requirements.
Event Details
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
3 Times Square, 28th Floor, New York, NY 10036
In-Person
Sindy Ding-Voorhees and Samera Ludwig
4:00-4:30 p.m. ET - Registration & Welcome
4:30-5:30 p.m. ET - Presentation
5:30-6:30 p.m. ET - Industry Mixer & Conversations
CLE Credit
MCLE Credit
To meet MCLE regulators’ attendance verification requirements for sponsors you must answer the poll questions during the program.
MCLE credit approval is pending. Credit generally is submitted, or certificates issued, within 60 days of post-program approval. CLE approval can take up to 90 days.
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP will apply for CLE credit when eligible in California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Virginia, and Washington. For states not listed, a Certificate of Attendance that lawyers may use to claim credit based on reciprocity or self-apply for credit will be provided.
We recommend you complete the webinar program in one format only (live or on-demand) since many states do not allow attorneys to earn live and on-demand credit for the same program in the same compliance period. Virtual participation or on-demand credit is not eligible in PA.
Contact
Rose Dettwyler
Marketing and Business Development Coordinator
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.

