Insights: Publications Using the ITC to Litigate Biopharma Cases: An Introduction
Corporate Disputes Magazine
Unlike district courts, the ITC does not award damages. Instead, it provides some of the strongest remedies available in US law: the limited exclusion order, an order barring the defendant’s infringing products from entering the US market, and the general exclusion order, which stops any and all infringing products from entering the US, regardless of the party making or selling them.
For biopharma companies facing global competition and complex infringement scenarios, the ITC offers a unique and often underutilised forum for protecting proprietary innovations.
The ITC’s authority to investigate and adjudicate allegations of unfair trade practices, including IP infringement, arises under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Section 337 investigations have become a critical part of the US patent enforcement landscape, especially in industries characterised by high research and development (R&D) costs, short product lifecycles or substantial international competition.
In 2025 alone, the ITC presided over 25 percent of all patent trials in the US, reflecting the ITC’s importance as a forum for resolving patent disputes across a variety of industries, including biopharma, chemicals and medical devices.
Types of products involved:
Biopharma and chemical ITC investigations have covered a wide array of products, such as: (i) medical equipment, including X-ray devices, surgical staplers, electrocardiograms, bone cements, hydrodermabrasion devices and lasers; (ii) chemicals such as pyraclostrobin, potassium chloride and ultraviolet coatings; (iii) pharmaceuticals including Botox, tirzepatide, albumins, recombinant factors VIII and IX, taurine, and adalimumab; and (iv) laboratory and diagnostic devices such as glucose monitoring strips, blood separating systems, digital polymerase chain reaction systems and immunoassays.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
