Insights: Publications Commons Problems and Simple Solutions
This series of articles is intended to provide a deep dive into the Illinois State Franchise Tax (the “Franchise Tax”) and should be read sequentially to be best understood. The first article covered the businesses and entities required to pay the Franchise Tax and the mechanics of the Franchise Tax system. The second defined the essential terms to understand the Franchise Tax and its calculation and covered some significant differences between the Franchise Tax and the state Income and Corporate Income Tax. The third provided specific resources and examples on correctly calculating your Allocation Factor for the Franchise Tax. For an overview of the Franchise Tax generally, please see our prior article on the topic here.
At Kilpatrick, we see five common problems with franchise tax filings. These issues relate to improper Allocation Factor calculation, increases in Paid-In Capital, timely reporting to the Illinois Secretary of State, and so-called “push-down accounting” being used on reports following successful mergers and acquisitions
To read the full article, please click Download PDF.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.