Please join us for a discussion among international intellectual property experts and practitioners on the rise of artificial intelligence and the applications (or potential applications) of intellectual property law to the field of artificial intelligence, as well as how IIP law may impact this rapidly developing field. Do the traditional IP regimes of copyright, patent, and trademark law apply to generative AI products? If so, in what instances and how? The panel will discuss the case of Andersen v. Stability AI and how creators of original content may protect their works from training use by generative AI programs. What constitutes a derivative work in the generative AI field? What constraints, if any, are there in IP law for the use of "data lakes" containing licensed and unlicensed content by AI programs? This panel will address these and other questions related to the application of IP law to AI.
Speakers:- Kerri Braun, Senior Corporate Counsel, Cisco Systems, Inc.
- Dale Cendali, Partner, Dale Cendali, P.C.
- John Hines, Partner, Clark Hill PLC
- Joseph Petersen, Managing Partner, Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP
- Daniel Hofilena, Founding Partner, Kalaw, Prasad & Hofilena Law
- Mary Ann McGrail, Attorney, Law Office of M.A. McGrail
Event Details
Tuesday, October 29, 2024
Zoom Webinar and YouTube Video
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
