Wednesday, March 6, 2024
Online via Microsoft Teams
Legal experts will discuss recent EU enforcement policy statements and UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) guidance, the implications for restrictive covenants and non-compete clauses, and competition law enforcement in the UK, EU, and US against no-poach agreements and wage fixing. The presenters will also provide insights on current enforcement trends, case studies, and recommendations on how employers can mitigate risk. This webinar is hosted by Pinsent Masons LLP and is tailored to in-house lawyers, General Counsel, in-house competition and employment lawyers, HR professionals, and trade associations. For more information and to register, click here.
Presenters:
- Christina E. Fahmy, Antitrust Partner at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
- Louise Baner, Director and Member of the Labor Market Team at the Competition and Markets Authority
- Alan Davis, Partner, Head of Competition, EU & Trade at Pinsent Masons LLP
- Dr. Anne Sammon, Employment Partner at Pinsent Masons LLP
Event Details
Wednesday, March 6, 2024
Online via Microsoft Teams
Contact
Jennifer Daughtry
Sr. Business Development & Marketing Specialist
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
