Why You Should Attend:
IP Discussions with Joshua Simmons is a series of conversations hosted by nationally recognized intellectual property litigator, Joshua Simmons. Each month, Josh is joined by a panel of IP luminaries, leading scholars, and industry insiders. Together, they examine major topics and events in a civil, roundtable format.
Every day, attorneys prosecute applications to register copyrights and trademarks and to seek the grant of patents. In addition to the ethics rules that govern their activities as attorneys, they and other individuals prosecuting IP rights may be subject to additional rules, such as the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct.
What You Will Learn:
After completing this program, viewers will be able to address:
- What rules of professional conduct apply to IP prosecution?
- How IP agencies are taking steps to prevent unethical prosecution practices?
- When an ethical issue arises, what can you do to remedy the misstep?
Who Should Attend:
IP lawyers and practitioners advising clients on trademark and patent prosecution issues should find this program to be informative.
Event Details
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
On-Demand
CLE Credit
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
