1100 Peachtree Street NE Suite 2800, Atlanta, GA USA 30309
Chris Leah focuses his practice on intellectual property disputes, including patent litigation in U.S. district courts and the International Trade Commission, post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and disputes under Section 1498. Chris is also a registered patent attorney before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Chris has represented clients across a variety of industries involving electrical, mechanical, and software related technologies, including telecommunications, medical devices, textile products, swimming pool equipment, and semiconductors. Chris has significant experience managing and conducting many aspects of litigation, including infringement and validity analyses, motion practice, claim construction, discovery, taking and defending depositions, expert discovery, and pre-trial proceedings. Additionally, he regularly assists and advises clients on a variety of other intellectual property matters, including pre-suit matters, assessments of patent portfolios, patent license agreements, and protections and immunities provided to government contractors under Section 1498.
While attending law school, Chris worked with the firm as a summer associate in 2018 and 2019 on its patent litigation and patent prosecution teams. Chris also served as a student attorney in the Entrepreneurship and Non-Profit Legal Clinic at The University of Alabama School of Law where he provided legal services to small businesses, start-ups and entrepreneurs, nonprofit organizations, inventors, social enterprises, and community development organizations.
While attending undergrad at The University of Alabama, Chris was an undergraduate researcher in Dr. Paul Allison’s Advanced Composite Materials Laboratory where Chris studied and prepared literary reviews and journal articles on friction stir welding and additive friction stir deposition as well as the microstructure and mechanical properties of rare earth metal alloys.
Experience
Represented adidas AG, adidas North America, Inc., adidas America, Inc., and adidas International Trading AG in patent infringement and importation investigation at ITC brought by Nike, Inc., related to the design and manufacture of shoe uppers for knitted footwear, with related action in Oregon federal court. One of the largest patent cases in the footwear industry, the case involved nine U.S. patents from multiple distinct families of patents, each covering a different subject matter. After completing both fact and expert discovery, the case was settled on confidential terms shortly before the evidentiary hearing at the ITC. In re Certain Knitted Footwear, U.S. ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1289; Nike, Inc. v. adidas AG et al., No. 3:21-cv-01780 (D. Or.)
Represented Zodiac Pool Systems LLC and Zodiac Pool Care Europe, leading manufacturers and innovators in the pool care industry, in a patent infringement and importation investigation at the International Trade Commission, with a related action in the Central District of California, against Wybotics, Co. Ltd. (d/b/a Winny Pool Cleaner), Tianjin Pool & Spa, Aiper Inc., Aiper Intelligent, LLC, and Shenzhen Aiper Intelligent Co., Ltd. The investigation involved two Zodiac patents covering pioneering technology in robotic pool cleaners. We were able to stop these entities’ infringement before trial. Specifically, before the close of fact discovery, Zodiac settled favorably with the Aiper entities on confidential terms, leading to the issuance of a consent order which bars Aiper from importing or selling any of the Accused Products in the United States. Zodiac also obtained sworn representations during discovery from Wybotics that it had completely stopped manufacturing, importing, and selling the Accused Products in the United States. Certain Robotic Pool Cleaners and Components Thereof, U.S. ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1326; Zodiac Pool Care Europe v. Wybotics, Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-05271 (C.D. Cal.). We also helped coordinate strategy for a seizure and infringement action in France involving the same products, which remains pending.
Defended Nalu Medical in a patent lawsuit filed by Nevro over spinal cord stimulators, which included injunctive relief to prevent Nalu from commercializing its recently FDA-approved neurostimulation system. On the eve of the claim construction hearing in Delaware, and shortly before the PTAB’s institution decision of Nalu’s IPR Petition challenging Nevro’s patent was due, we obtained a favorable settlement for Nalu. Nevro Corp. v. Nalu Medical, Inc., No. 1-20-cv-00291 (D. Del.) and Nalu Medical, Inc. v. Nevro Corp., IPR2021-01023 (PTAB)
Insights View All
News Releases
News Releases
University of Alabama School of Law J.D. (2020)
University of Alabama B.S., Mechanical Engineering (2017) magna cum laude
Georgia (2021)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2023)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (2021)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2017)
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
