1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700, Seattle, WA USA 98101
Ryan Strauss is a registered patent attorney with extensive experience in patent preparation, prosecution, portfolio management, invention harvesting, and claim strategies targeting competitor products and technical standards.
Ryan has prepared and prosecuted hundreds of U.S. and international patent applications across a broad range of technologies including wireless communication, edge and cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), autonomous vehicles, medical devices, wearables and sensor devices, augmented reality and virtual reality technologies, and blockchain and cryptocurrencies/NFTs, among many others.
Prior to joining the firm, Ryan practiced as of counsel at a boutique intellectual property firm in New Jersey and as a shareholder in a Pacific Northwest law firm, where he focused on software and hardware patent prosecution.
Florida Institute of Technology B.S., Computer Engineering (2005) cum laude
Rutgers University School of Law J.D. (2009) cum laude
Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the USPTO. Not admitted in Washington state, practicing exclusively before the USPTO.
Florida (2010)
Oregon (2016)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2011)
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
