The 2017-18 term of the U.S. Supreme Court signaled a noticeable tilt to the right on many decisions of fundamental importance. The recent resignation of Justice Anthony Kennedy and the impending Senate confirmation hearings promise to bring high political drama in the coming months. Join our distinguished panel of experts for a discussion of the most significant decisions of the term, including recent rulings on presidential power, redistricting, religious and LGBTQ rights, fourth amendment protections, and other issues, as well as a discussion of the contributions of Justice Kennedy and the prospect of what his absence could mean for future decisions on civil rights and reproductive freedom.
2018 Patron & Sustaining Members - Free
Click below to pay for luncheon via Paypal
2018 Regular Members - $25
Non Members - $40
Table of Up to Ten - $300**
(**Preferred seating and sponsorship recognition
optional for full table purchases)
RSVP by Tuesday, July 10, 2018 to wdgriggs@yahoo.com
Event Details
Thursday, July 12, 2018
The Belo Mansion
2101 Ross Avenue (Ross and Olive), Dallas, Texas 75201
11:30 a.m. - Registration/Buffet
12:00 p.m. - Program
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
