Wednesday, October 12, 2022
Raleigh, NC
The panel will begin with an overview of the Supreme Court's 2021-2022 Term. They will then discuss the major cases decided by the Court during this term. They will conclude with a preview of the important cases on the Supreme Court's docket during its upcoming term beginning in October. Discussions will include insights into how decisions will impact the industry.
Speakers:
Adam Charnes
Partner, Kilpatrick Townsend
Michael Greene
Senior Counsel, Enviva
Brian Vick
Managing Counsel, Blue Cross NC
Event Details
Wednesday, October 12, 2022
Raleigh, NC
11:30 a.m. Registration
12:00 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. Presentation
CLE Credit
MCLE credit approval is pending for 1.5 hours (General). Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP will apply for CLE credit when eligible in North Carolina. For all others states, a Certificate of Attendance that lawyers may use to claim credit based on reciprocity or self-apply for credit will be provided. Credit generally is submitted or certificates issued within 30 days of the course or post-program approval. Please note approval can take up to 90 days.
Contact
Vanessa C Hardee
Marketing Manager
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
