Insights: Publications Video | AI Post-Election—Initial Government Insights
The Trump administration's and the incoming Congress's early focus on artificial intelligence (“AI”) as a key component of their agendas is of critical importance to the development of the technology as well as to those entities that utilize AI. The administration's signaled commitment to leveraging AI for national security, economic efficiency, and competitive advantage, along with the anticipated repeal of Executive Order 14110 and subsequent regulatory changes, signals a new direction in American AI development which purports to prioritize innovation and global competitiveness. As federal agencies and states adjust to these policy shifts, stakeholders across various sectors must remain vigilant and adaptive to navigate the evolving landscape of AI regulation and implementation. The emphasis on AI within the Trump administration not only highlights its potential impact on government operations but also sets the stage for broader federal and state legislative and regulatory developments that will shape the future of AI in the United States.
Related People
Related Industries
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
