Section 337 investigations and litigation are evolving in important ways ─ from public interest considerations to novel ways of satisfying the domestic industry requirement and new approaches to Standard Essential Patents. Topics discussed in this presentation will include:
- Learn what is involved in the administration of GEOs and limited exclusion orders (LEOs) at U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”)
- Gain insights into steps a license holder should take to ensure the proper enforcement of an exclusion order and to work with authorities in the relevant procedures
- Delve into how jurisdiction over enforcement and modification proceedings is split between the ITC and Customs
- Examine the Commission’s institution on its own initiative of a modification proceeding in Certain Road Construction Machines & Components Thereof (Inv. 337 TA 1088) in January 2020 following the respondent’s plea to Customs to address redesign of the product
- As a respondent, understand how to best time your introduction of a redesign into an ITC proceeding at the investigation stage and how to appropriately navigate modification proceedings
- Explore how the decision likely to be rendered prior to June in Certain Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Methods of Producing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-1120) will bear materiality on the question of redesigns
- Learn how the pending decision in Panjiva, Inc. et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al. (No. 19-118), an appellate dispute over whether aircraft manifest data can be made public, is likely to affect future Customs enforcement
- Explore how current policy priorities under the Trump administration have impacted enforcement of exclusion orders
Event Details
Monday, August 24, 2020
On-Demand Virtual Conference
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
