Lawyers at Small and Big Law increasingly are working together to provide the best representation for clients. Myriad factors are driving such collaboration, including the growing need for niche legal specialties to service international clients; multi-party representation in investigations; clients’ desire to hire women/minority/LGTBQ owned businesses; and the growing number of attorneys (many women and other minorities) who are launching their own firms, often following successful careers in Big Law, In-House, and/or Government. The advantages of Big-Small Law collaboration are not familiar to all lawyers.
Presenters Adria L. Perez (Partner, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP), Naana A. Frimpong (Counsel, King & Spalding LLP), and Kristin Graham Koehler (Partner, Sidley Austin LLP) will share stories of success and help generate a lively discussion about how and when Big-Small law teaming can generate significant benefits for lawyers, their clients and even broader equity goals.
This panel presentation is sponsored by the Women’s White Collar Defense Association (WWCDA), Small Firm Initiative (SFI).
Event Details
Thursday, April 29, 2021
Online
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
