Megan Saia is a registered patent attorney who focuses her practice on patent prosecution and counseling in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology fields.
Prior to joining the firm, Megan worked in an immunotherapy research lab at the University of Florida. There, she developed CAR-T cell therapies and mRNA-based vaccines for glioblastoma multiforme brain tumors. Megan also served as a law clerk at the United States International Trade Commission in Washington, D.C., where she focused on cross-border patent infringement disputes.
Megan graduated in the top 5% of her class from University of Florida Levin College of Law. There, she was a member of the Florida Law Review and earned CALI awards in Patent Law, Trademark Law, Media Law, and Social Justice Lawyering.
Megan is conversant in Italian.
Insights View All
University of Florida Levin College of Law J.D., Intellectual Property Certificate (2023) magna cum laude, Order of the Coif
University of Florida B.S., Neurobiological Sciences (2020) magna cum laude, Dean’s Medal for Excellence in Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dean’s List, College of Medicine University Scholar’s Award
Georgia (2023)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2023)
Guardian ad Litem, Volunteer
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
