Evan Nadel is a litigator who represents clients in disputes related to technology and handles the full gamut of class action cases. His work on technology-related cases and business disputes encompasses false advertising and unfair competition, privacy, data breach, trademark, licensing, contract, and fraud matters.
Evan is the co-chair of the firm’s Class Action Practice Group. He has spent more than 25 years defending companies in putative class actions in California and elsewhere involving consumer products, online services, false advertising, and other product liability claims. The majority of these lawsuits included claims under consumer protection and unfair competition laws, including California's Unfair Competition Law, California's False Advertising Act, and California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Evan has extensive experience representing clients in appeals in both state and federal courts. He also has an active insurance litigation practice, handling coverage claims and disputes among primary and excess insurers in a variety of contexts, including contribution and indemnification actions. In addition, Evan has represented clients in complex biotech and healthcare litigation.
Prior to joining the firm, Evan was a partner in the New York City and San Francisco offices of an Am Law 100 firm, where he co-chaired its Class Action Practice group and was a member of its Sports and Entertainment Practice, and his complex litigation practice focused on technology-related litigation and class actions involving intellectual property, commercial contract disputes, along with healthcare, insurance, trade secret, unfair competition, and other internet-related litigation.
Evan has been recognized as a New York “Super Lawyer” (2023) for Class Actions & Mass Torts, a Northern California “Super Lawyer” (2014-2020) for Class Actions & Mass Torts, and a Northern California “Rising Star” (2009-2012) by Super Lawyers magazine. He was also recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® for Commercial Litigation (2024). Evan was featured in a front-page article of The Recorder in 2009 regarding a successful motion to deny class certification in a nationwide consumer products class action in federal court alleging false advertising and unfair competition (Cal. Business & Prof. Code § 17200 and other state analogues). He is admitted to practice in California, New York, and Florida.
Class Actions and Product Liability
*Successfully defended the county’s largest operator of obstacle and endurance races in a nationwide class action in Florida federal court claiming false representations including an allegedly misleading online registration fee charged to racers. Strong opposition to class certification resulted in resolution with no payment by client.
*Successfully resolved a large California consumer class action against a multinational corporation, which provides software as a service and online ticketing, along with participant management for events, competitions and activities over an online registration process for its membership program.
*Conceived, briefed, and argued winning motion to pre-emptively deny class certification in putative nationwide class action against one of the world's largest retailers. The district court granted our motion denying class certification before any discovery occurred, and the Ninth Circuit rejected the plaintiff's request for interlocutory review. Based on products labeled "Made in USA" but allegedly containing imported components, the class asserted claims under the false advertising and unfair competition laws of all 50 states (including section 17200 and the CLRA).
*Defended through trial a major electronic component manufacturer in a multi-district federal court class action alleging antitrust claims based on a global pricing cartel with billions of dollars at stake.
*Defended a national financial institution and its federal savings bank subsidiary in putative class action in federal court by borrowers whose vehicles were repossessed, alleging violation of California's Rees-Levering Act (concerning required content of notices of repossession and deficiencies on auto loans) as a predicate for unfair competition (§ 17200) claims.
*Represented a major U.S. sporting goods retailer in unfair competition (§ 17200) and related claims in California concerning alleged pricing discrepancies.
*Defended top U.S. title insurer in a putative class action in a coordinated federal court case alleging antitrust and unfair competition (§ 17200) claims. Eliminated antitrust claims on motion to dismiss and succeeded in compelling individual (non-class) arbitration on remaining claims based on recent Supreme Court precedent.
*Successfully defended a national consumer products manufacturer in a series of three coordinated unfair competition and false advertising class actions in California seeking billions of dollars and injunctive relief (based primarily on § 17200). Secured effective victory in one case through class decertification and in the other two through successful summary judgment motions.
*Defended a medical records imaging company in a putative class action in Florida alleging violation of Florida Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act based on alleged noncompliance with statute governing permissible copy charges.
*Won summary judgment in product liability and negligence action filed by a chain of volcanic islands in the Pacific Ocean against a consumer products company.
*Defeated class certification in federal court action in California alleging false and misleading marketing based on fraud, unfair competition (§ 17200), and warranty theories. Action was pending less than nine months when the court rejected class certification.
IP, Technology-Related, and Other Complex Litigation
*Defended a software modification and customization firm in contract, fraud, and 17200 action involving the design and implementation of an enterprise resource planning software (ERP) system.
*Defended a company providing customized radio frequency identification (RFID) asset tracking technology in an action involving trade secrets and technology issues.
*Represented the owner of famous trademarks in the kitchenware industry in parallel federal trademark infringement actions pending in California and New York (along with § 17200 and other claims). We briefed and argued successful motion to stay California action.
*Defended a software programming firm in contract disputes concerning a customized e-commerce website and client application.
*Represented a website in a dispute pending simultaneously in federal and state courts over trademark and ownership rights in domain name and website assets.
*Represented numerous clients in disputes over internet domain names and related trademark issues including compelling transfer of infringing domain names.
*Represented a variety of clients, including wine makers, a ski and snowshoe manufacturer, and a pharmaceuticals company in trademark disputes including Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) proceedings and negotiation of co-existence agreements.
*Defended a German software manufacturer against contract claims by a U.S.-based distributor and prosecuted counter claims for trademark and copyright infringement in federal court.
*Managed an action by a manufacturer of printed circuit boards against a non-U.S. consumer involving compliance with specifications for plasma TV technology.
*Successfully defended a consumer website company in actions alleging violation of California's Anti-Spam laws.
*Advised a trademark owner in a dispute with a licensee over a breach of license agreement and infringement of marks and proposing a creative resolution.
*Participated in a bench trial on advertising and a First Amendment case against the attorney general.
*Obtained complete dismissal on pleadings in a federal employment discrimination, defamation, and negligence case.
*Counseled and advised an Internet retailer concerning the effects of regulations in all U.S. jurisdictions governing online tobacco sales.
*Counseled an Internet client on trademark and privacy issues surrounding online promotions.
*Won a favorable settlement for an Internet caching service client in an arbitration involving Lanham Act false advertising claims.
Business Disputes, Contracts, Real Estate, and Fraud Litigation
*Represented biotech investor that was misled into investing in startup by a prominent Stanford professor. Obtained full recovery of all investment losses, a $28 million judgment after month-long trial.
*Successfully enjoined UCC foreclosure sale of pledged ownership interest case in a $350 million project in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
*Obtained dismissal with prejudice of all 13 claims, including fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and California Corporations Code violations, in a federal securities action against a prominent investment banker.
*Defended healthcare plan in California litigation by network pharmacy, obtained complete dismissal with prejudice of all claims on the pleadings before any discovery.
*Defended healthcare plan from claims by medical service providers seeking full billed charges for services paid at government rates for years.
*Defended a managing broker-dealer of real estate securities in connection with claims arising from sale of investor interests in a California commercial real estate project.
*Represented an owner of landmark multifamily residential real estate property in California in an action involving claims of wrongful foreclosure, slander of title, breach of contract, and UCL (§ 17200) violations.
*Won an appeal and obtained an award of attorneys' fees for appellate work in a real estate contract dispute.
*Defended five defendants in a 10-count action brought by a former president, director, and shareholder of one of the corporate defendants. Most of the claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, RICO, conversion, employment discrimination, and unlawful termination, were dismissed on the pleadings.
*Obtained a favorable jury verdict in a California federal action involving fraud, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO), and False Claims Act claims in a government-funded transportation construction project.
*Counseled and advised numerous insurance companies on coverage and defense matters, including serving as panel counsel for a leading technology insurer.
*On behalf of one of the three largest mattress manufacturers in U.S., obtained coverage from insurer for full defense of nationwide federal court class action alleging false and misleading representations about products. Won summary judgment in district court, and successfully defended judgment on appeal in Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
*Defended large U.S. insurer in federal court coverage action brought by purported additional insured under policy facing hundreds of millions of dollars in claims arising from wildfire litigation.
*Defended insurance carriers against claims of bad faith, contribution, and indemnity seeking more than $200 million involving complex allocation across decades of policies stemming from long-tail product liability claims.
*Prosecuted and defended equitable contribution, indemnity, and subrogation claims on behalf of numerous insurers, including in direct action against insurer, multi-party construction defect cases, and disputes among primary and excess insurers in product liability actions.
*Represented insurance carrier in action against broker for misappropriating premiums and failing to properly account for funds among insurers.
*Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick
Insights View All
New York University School of Law J.D. (1997)
University of Pennsylvania B.A., English and History (1994) magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa
New York (1998)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1997-1998)
Bar Association of San Francisco, Litigation Executive Committee, Member
American Bar Association, Litigation Section and ABA Advisory Panel, Member
International Trademark Association (INTA), Member
Annual Survey of American Law (Journal), Senior Article Editor
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.