In the early 19th century, the amazing properties of rubber seemed miraculous to many. Derived from thick sap drained from trees in the tropics, it could easily be formed into malleable curiosities. But rubber’s inherent properties rendered it useless in the summer heat, melting into a gooey and foulsmelling mess. In colder weather, it was rendered weak and brittle. Charles Goodyear was obsessed with finding a solution. Frequently experimenting in his kitchen, he seemingly had tried everything. With little benefit from his efforts, he fell on hard times, and his family suffered. Then, in 1841, Goodyear found the solution—later known as the vulcanization of rubber—which formed the resilient rubber we all know today. Although he was granted U.S. Patent No. 3,633 in 1844, he spent years struggling to stop infringers from copying his process worldwide, and he ultimately died penniless.
Justin Krieger shares the story of Charles Goodyear and the vulcanization of rubber. He also will share his thoughts and answer questions on what every chemist should know about patents.
Event Details
Tuesday, May 28, 2024
Attimo Winery
2246 Larimer Street, Denver, Colorado 80285
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
