Insights: Publications 5 Key Takeaways | Recent Developments in US Trademark and Unfair Competition Law
Kilpatrick partner Ted Davis spoke recently at the International Trademark Association’s annual meeting on recent developments in United States trademark and unfair competition law over the trailing twelve months.
That presentation addressed, inter alia, the following topics and key takeaways:
1. Vidal v. Elster, 602 U.S. 286 (2024), in which the Supreme Court for the first time employed a history-and-tradition framework when evaluating a First Amendment-based challenge to government action, and which therefore has possible consequences far beyond trademark law;
2. Dewberry Engineers Inc. v. Dewberry Group, 145 S. Ct. 681 (2025), in which the Court confirmed that the inherently flexible nature of the equitable remedy of an accounting of a defendant’s profits nevertheless is subject to guardrails;
3. revised findings of fact and conclusions of law on remand in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. 140 (2023);
4. the continued viability of the test for infringement first articulated in Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989), in cases not presenting trademark uses by defendants; and
5. the possible beginning of the end for the Dawn Donut Doctrine.
For more information, please contact:
Ted Davis: tdavis@ktslaw.com.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.

